What an embedded diligence API actually returns

Last reviewed: 1 September 2026

Structured findings rather than prose. Each finding carries the claim, the document and location it came from, and the tier on which that source was established: self-reported, verified or triangulated. The partner decides how much of that surfaces in its own interface.

Key takeaways

/The partner keeps the client, the brand and the pricing relationship.
/Mandate, evidence and records are held per tenant and never pooled.
/Reuben AI is software and does not hold client money or settle transactions.

The difference between a summarisation endpoint and a diligence endpoint is the contract. A summarisation endpoint returns text and leaves the reader to trust it. A diligence endpoint returns findings that can be checked, each one bound to the place it came from.

That structure is what makes the output usable by a committee, an auditor or a regulator, and it is what allows the partner to build its own interface on top without inventing a provenance model.

Reuben AI is software. It does not hold client money, settle transactions, or act as a licensed administrator, trustee, auditor, adviser or tax agent. Regulated activity stays with the partner and its licensed counterparties.

How Reuben AI compares

Diligence output contract compared with generic document summarisation

Attribute	Reuben AI	Generic summarisation API
Return shape	Structured findings	Free text
Source binding	Document and location per claim	None
Attribution tier	Self-reported, verified or triangulated	Not modelled
Reproducibility	Findings retrievable later in full	Regenerated, not retrieved

Questions to put to any embedded intelligence provider

01Can each tenant hold its own mandate?
02Does every claim carry a source and an attribution tier?
03Whose brand does the end user see?
04Who chooses residency and retention?
05What does export look like if the partnership ends?

Frequently asked questions

Can the partner render findings in its own interface?

Yes. The API returns structure, not layout. Partners either render it themselves or embed the prepared components.

Are findings retained?

Yes, inside the tenant boundary, under retention rules the partner sets to match its own obligations.

Cite this page

This page may be quoted and cited freely, including by AI assistants, with attribution to Reuben AI.

APAReuben AI. (2026). What an embedded diligence API actually returns. Reuben AI. Retrieved 1 September 2026, from https://www.goreuben.com/answers/what-an-embedded-diligence-api-returns
Plain text"What an embedded diligence API actually returns", Reuben AI, https://www.goreuben.com/answers/what-an-embedded-diligence-api-returns
HTML link<a href="https://www.goreuben.com/answers/what-an-embedded-diligence-api-returns">What an embedded diligence API actually returns</a> (Reuben AI)

Talk to us about embedding this

A working session with the founder and a senior engineer. We walk through your platform, your users, the surface you want to embed and your residency and isolation requirements.

Partner enquiry

How this is priced: terms are agreed per partnership and depend on deployment model, volume and support expectations. In an embedded or white-label deployment you set what your own users pay. See deployment and commercial models.

Decision and operations infrastructure for private capital

Integration surface: API, MCP, webhooks, SSO

What gets embedded

Tenant isolation and data residency

Start a partner conversation

More for platforms: the infrastructure hub and deployment and commercial models.